Package Search
Members: 353 | Topics: 767 | Posts: 3211
We welcome our newest member: ClintBarton
» You aren't logged in, login or registerOnline: No members and 25 guests | Time: 10:58
Paldo and licenses
paldo Support Forum    paldo    General Discussion
Reply Reply   Subscribe Topic Subscribe Topic
A great distro but …
2 posts found.
 Paldo and licenses
Junior Mitglied
Posts: 28
Registered: 2008-05-12
I’am using Paldo GNU/Linux for about a week now and I have to confess that it really rocks:

  • It’s a pure distro (not ubuntuazed!),
  • it’s (more or less) easy,
  • it’s up to date and
  • it’s not buggy even though it’s always up to date!

BUT: There is many non-free software – and even worse: these software is not declared as non-free. I would love Paldo if you would add the licenses of the packages on their software description pages (e. g.
Profile   Private Message
Created: 2008-11-11 19:40 | Modified: 2008-11-11 19:40 by Debianux
Highlight selected Text   Edit   Delete   Quote Reply
 Re: Paldo and licenses
Posts: 1187
Registered: 2006-11-23
Yes you're right. Some of your packages are non-free you'll find declared as example in debian. Here is one of my examples:

I wrote the install-script for REALbasic. You won't find it in any other distribution. Well I don't redistribute it actually. It is only a upkg-script to download the software from the vendor page and install it with upkg.
Even we don't host the tgz-tarball on our servers cos of the troubles with re-distribution. So REALbasic is for sure a commercial linux software but free for use on linux.

Putting some licenses on a rls-page shouldn't be an issue. It is doable.
Let's see what Jürg and Co will say to this thread ...
Profile   Private Message   E-Mail
Created: 2008-11-12 00:11
Highlight selected Text   Edit   Delete   Quote Reply
Subscribe Topic Subscribe Topic
powered by bitron board 1.23a