did we patched Kernel 2.6.21.1 for sis900? | |
|
|
Moderator Linux-Dude Posts: 1187 Registered: 2006-11-23 | Some user posted me problems with their sis chipsets, so it seems we didn't patched the kernel for sis900. I found here a patch:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=117761259222165&w=2
Code | [In neuem Fenster öffnen] | | Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
sis900.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sis900.c b/drivers/net/sis900.c
index a6a0f09..7e44939 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sis900.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sis900.c
@@ -1754,6 +1754,7 @@ static int sis900_rx(struct net_device *net_dev)
sis_priv->rx_ring[entry].cmdsts = RX_BUF_SIZE;
} else {
struct sk_buff * skb;
+ struct sk_buff * rx_skb;
pci_unmap_single(sis_priv->pci_dev,
sis_priv->rx_ring[entry].bufptr, RX_BUF_SIZE,
@@ -1787,10 +1788,10 @@ static int sis900_rx(struct net_device *net_dev)
}
/* give the socket buffer to upper layers */
- skb = sis_priv->rx_skbuff[entry];
- skb_put(skb, rx_size);
- skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, net_dev);
- netif_rx(skb);
+ rx_skb = sis_priv->rx_skbuff[entry];
+ skb_put(rx_skb, rx_size);
+ skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(rx_skb, net_dev);
+ netif_rx(rx_skb);
/* some network statistics */
if ((rx_status & BCAST) == MCAST)
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: did we patched Kernel 2.6.21.1 for sis900? | |
|
|
Administrator Posts: 426 Registered: 2004-09-09 | That's fixed in 2.6.21.2-paldo1 which is building right now. |
|
|
|
|
|