just smile | |
|
|
Moderator Linux-Dude Posts: 1187 Registered: 2006-11-23 | I looked again at archlinux. Seems they have almost the same goal as we have. The installation process is in paldo much simpler.
... I don't understand why arch is more popular than paldo? |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: just smile | |
|
|
Junior Mitglied Posts: 11 Registered: 2008-08-03 | Zitat | | Arch Linux is an i686-optimized linux distribution that was originally based on ideas from CRUX, a great distribution developed by Per Lid |
I don't have an i686, but an amd64. How could a CPU-specialized OS be popular at all is beyond me. .............................. sudo make breakfast |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: just smile | |
|
|
Junior Mitglied Posts: 23 Registered: 2008-02-18 | Zitat | | Original erstellt: 2007-02-27 20:53 von Amnon82
... I don't understand why arch is more popular than paldo? |
Maybe Archlinux more software packages? |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: just smile | |
|
|
Junior Mitglied Posts: 11 Registered: 2008-08-03 | Zitat | | Original erstellt: 2008-08-03 11:19 von kim88
Maybe Archlinux more software packages? |
I use Ubuntu as my primary OS, it has enough packages to make the work done. But it's a hobby of mine to tryout various OSes and play with software/hardware, so I usually look for cute names...
Besides, who cares about the repos, you can always install from source tarballs. Is't even easier done than said.
When you play a video game and you can't beat the boss, you just get frustrated. When you fail to compile something, you just fix the source. .............................. sudo make breakfast |
|
|
|
|
|